More Tests?!: It’s Not Just Interviews Anymore

Date Jasmine Flowers August 3, 2007

You walk into a company for an interview. You go through a few interviews with different managers; you receive accolades from your interviewers, and are told that you will be contacted within 2 days for the next round. Within 48 hours you receive an email stating that your next round is a series of tests that you must pass (regardless of your interview scores or performance) in order to even be considered for the position.

Recently, one of my friends went through an interview process for a company and was surprised with an aptitude test as part of the process. The entire job offer rested on the ability to pass a sequence of tests. The numerous interviews conducted at the beginning of the process became irrelevant to the offer process. I was shocked when I heard this because I have never had to take a test to get a job. I have been through several interview rounds and case studies with numerous people but never a test. So, I did a little research and I learned that more companies are starting to utilize pre-employment tests to determine a person’s personality, skills and fit within the culture. “Since 1999, the number of Fortune 500 companies requiring job applicants to take personality assessment tests has jumped to about 40% from 25%”, according to Career-Intelligence. It is believed that these tests will increase the likelihood of hiring top performers and improve retention rates.

According to an article on careeractivist.com, “companies are afraid to make mistakes in the hiring process.” Since when does a test solely determine a person’s personality and skills? The world of recruiting has become quite the challenge these days so maybe just an interview is no longer enough to determine a candidate’s fit. In my opinion, what remains constant is that the best way to gauge a candidate’s personality is to have interaction with them and create opportunities for them to interact with others in the organization. Take them out to lunch with the team, be thorough in your due diligence of their previous work experience and performance, and if that’s not enough give them a case study or a simulation to complete as part of the interview process. My point is that there are other means in which to measure a candidate’s skills, future performance, and compatibility with an organizations culture. Let’s not rely on just the numbers.

2 Responses to “More Tests?!: It’s Not Just Interviews Anymore”

  1. Stephanie Cohen said:

    This is an interesting issue - sounds like the trials of getting into a great college continue into our later professional life. I hope employers are not relying too much on these tests.

    Let me put it this way, I was accepted into Emory University back in 1988 and it was NOT because of my SAT scores that is for sure. According to that test, English should be my second language. My essay was fabulous and my after school contributions really pushed me ahead.

    Thanks for the heads up on this topic!

  2. Jasmine Flowers said:

    Thanks for your comment. The fact that employers are relying solely on these preemployment tests really shows the lack of confidence in the ability of recruiting and hiring managers to select quality candidates who can perform exceptionally over the long term. It is an unfortunate trend that is becoming more prevalent in organizations.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>